COVID-19 severity affected by antibodies targeting proteins

Washington [US], December 25 (ANI): A recent study revealed that COVID-19 antibodies decrease significantly within several months of infection and preferentially target a different part of the virus in mild COVID-19 cases than severe ones.

The results published in Science Immunology identify new links between the course of the disease and a patient’s immune response to it. They also raise concerns that people could be reinfected, whether antibody tests to detect a previous infection could underestimate the magnitude of the pandemic, and whether vaccinations may need to be repeated at regular intervals to maintain a protective immune response.

“This is one of the most comprehensive studies to date of the immune response of antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 in people across the spectrum of disease severity, from asymptomatic to fatal,” said Scott Boyd, MD, Ph.D. , associate professor of pathology. “We evaluated multiple time points and sample types, and we also analyzed viral RNA levels in patients’ nasopharyngeal swabs and blood samples. It is one of the first general insights into this disease.” The study found that people with severe COVID-19 have low proportions of antibodies that target the spike protein used by the virus to enter human cells compared to the number of antibodies that target the virus’s inner shell proteins. .

Boyd is a senior author on the study, published Dec.7 in Science Immunology. Other senior authors are Benjamin Pinsky, MD, Ph.D., associate professor of pathology, and Peter Kim, Ph.D., Virginia and DK Ludwig Professor of Biochemistry. Lead authors are researcher Katharina Roltgen, Ph.D .; postdoctoral scholars Abigail Powell, Ph.D., and Oliver Wirz, Ph.D.; and clinical instructor Bryan Stevens, MD.

The virus binds to the ACE2 receptor Researchers studied 254 people with asymptomatic, mild, or severe COVID-19 who were identified via routine tests or occupational health screening at Stanford Health Care or who came to a Stanford clinic Health Care with symptoms of COVID- 19. Of the people with symptoms, 25 were treated on an outpatient basis, 42 were admitted out of the intensive care unit, and 37 were treated in the intensive care unit. Twenty-five people in the study died from the disease.

SARS-CoV-2 binds to human cells via a structure on its surface called a spike protein. This protein binds to a receptor on human cells called ACE2. The binding allows the virus to enter and infect the cell. Once inside, the virus loses its outer coat to reveal an inner shell that encloses its genetic material. Soon, the virus co-opts the cell’s protein-making mechanism to churn out more viral particles, which are then released to infect other cells.

Antibodies that recognize and bind to the spike protein block its ability to bind to ACE2, preventing the virus from infecting cells, while antibodies that recognize other viral components are unlikely to prevent viral spread. Current vaccine candidates use portions of the spike protein to stimulate an immune response.

Boyd and his colleagues analyzed the levels of three types of antibodies – IgG, IgM, and IgA – and the proportions that targeted the viral peak protein or inner shell of the virus as the disease progressed and patients recovered or became ill. . They also measured the levels of viral genetic material in nasopharyngeal samples and in the patients’ blood. Finally, they evaluated the effectiveness of the antibodies in preventing the binding of the spike protein to ACE2 in a laboratory dish.

“Although previous studies have evaluated the overall antibody response to infection, we have compared the viral proteins targeted by these antibodies,” Boyd said. “We found that disease severity correlated with the ratio of antibodies that recognize spike protein domains to other non-protective viral targets. Those people with mild disease tended to have a higher percentage of anti-spike antibodies and those who are. who died from their disease had more antibodies that recognized other parts of the virus. “Substantial variability in immune response The researchers caution, however, that although the study identified trends among a group of patients, there still exists substantial variability in the immune response mounted by the individual patients, especially those with severe illness.

“Antibody responses are probably not the only determining factor in someone’s outcome,” Boyd said. “Among people with serious illness, some die and others recover. Some of these patients activate a vigorous immune response and others have a more moderate response. So, there are many other things going on. There are other branches of the system as well. immune involved. It is important to note that our results identify correlations but do not demonstrate causation. “As in other studies, the researchers found that people with asymptomatic and mild diseases had lower overall antibody levels than those with diseases. severe. After recovery, IgM and IgA levels steadily decreased to low or undetectable levels in most patients for approximately one to four months after symptom onset or estimated date of infection, and IgG levels decreased significantly.

“This is fairly consistent with what has been seen with other coronaviruses routinely circulating in our communities to cause the common cold,” Boyd said. “It is not uncommon for someone to be reinfected within a year or sometimes earlier. It remains to be seen whether the immune response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination is stronger or persists longer than that caused by natural infection. It is entirely possible it could. be better. But there are many questions that still need to be answered. “Boyd is a co-chair of the National Cancer Institute’s SeroNet Serological Sciences Network, one of the nation’s largest coordinated research efforts to study the immune response to COVID- 19. He is the principal investigator of the Center of Excellence in SeroNet at Stanford, which is addressing critical questions about the mechanisms and duration of immunity to SARS-CoV-2.

“For example, if someone has already been infected, should they get the vaccine? If so, how to prioritize them?” Boyd said. “How can we adapt seroprevalence studies in vaccinated populations? How will immunity from vaccination differ from that caused by a natural infection? And how long could a vaccine be protective? These are all very interesting and important questions.” (ANI)